Credited to England's oosyadaddy at the long archived Mysterial admin/owner Mark Elvidge
Ref REMEMBER PEARL HARBOR 12/7/41
![π΄](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f534.svg)
@OHS
Looking at it could it have been a prophetic message. I remember watching the usual "I'm right your wrong" negative documentaries that relate towards psychic phenomena. On it were Penn and Teller 2 pl who I admire a lot and are big fans of (regardless of what they think of my beliefs and practices).
In this they talked about 9/11 and they said in a passionate way that they could not think of anymore evil then knowing that 9/11 was going to happen and do nothing about it.
Now firstly I though the biggest evil was the scum that carried it out. Then (as is my way) I took in what they said and thought about it. I in ways pride myself on the fact that I don't blind myself from alternative news arguments about mediumship and psychic phenomena. I look and really do listen to debunkers views on what I do. Sadly though the great arguments they make are generally lost in the personal issues and revulsion that debunkers let get the better of them and weaken it.
I call them debunkers because they are, I don't call them sceptic because they are not. In my view a debunker is equally damaging to paranormal research is as a fanatical beaver is to trees. They both see the evidence given to them and they manipulate it to suit there pre conceived ideas. Therefore the conclusion they come to on both sides is what they want it to be rather than what it could be.
The sceptic on the other hand looks at the evidence that is portrayed to them and look at all possible angels and comes to a conclusion from that. Not necessarily right but one that is comfortable to them. Yes, u can argue that the debunkers/fanatical believers view is the same and in many ways it is but u cannot be truly open minded if u look at something with prejudice it isn't easy to do but is possible and that is why I class my self as a sceptic even though I believe.
To get back to Penn and Teller and there statement that the evil was doing nothing, u have to argue that if we knew and days before we tipped off the authorities (as I am sure some did) would we have been listened to? Would they have just said OK we will send someone out and leave it at that? I think they would of locked us up in an asylum. Either way if those that could, did do something nothing would have been done. The reason being is the general scientific and cynical nature the world finds itself in.
Science has its place but it is in danger of becoming like religion that people follow without understanding and as religion has (in my view) reaching the end of it life and usefulness. Is science in danger of becoming its not so worthy replacement, Human kind needs something to believe in but rarely do they believe in themselves instead just opting to believe in someone else
Every generation always thinks they have the answers only to be shown up by the next generation that they really didn't know anything. The curse of ignorance is the worst curse on man that there could be it holds us back from what we truly can be.
How do we know that one the message existed, why nothing was done (even though from such a vague message in relation to the time it was written what could u have got from that) and even if it was worked out would anyone have believed it and acted upon it? Sadly I think not!
MK II
![π](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f64f.svg)