NASA ANALYST: Bush WAS wired during debates

Archive - Caveat Emptor!

Moderator: Super Moderators

Post Reply
Faedrea
Pirate
Posts: 1827
Joined: 05-17-2003 12:05 AM

NASA ANALYST: Bush WAS wired during debates

Post by Faedrea » 10-29-2004 05:41 AM

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/ ... ex_np.html


NASA Imaging:

Image

NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate
Physicist says imaging techniques prove the president's bulge was not caused by wrinkled clothing.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Kevin Berger



Oct. 29, 2004 | George W. Bush tried to laugh off the bulge. "I don't know what that is," he said on "Good Morning America" on Wednesday, referring to the infamous protrusion beneath his jacket during the presidential debates. "I'm embarrassed to say it's a poorly tailored shirt."

Dr. Robert M. Nelson, however, was not laughing. He knew the president was not telling the truth. And Nelson is neither conspiracy theorist nor midnight blogger. He's a senior research scientist for NASA and for Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and an international authority on image analysis. Currently he's engrossed in analyzing digital photos of Saturn's moon Titan, determining its shape, whether it contains craters or canyons.

------------------


Any comments racehorse or ben?

User avatar
Mercury
Pirate
Posts: 866
Joined: 12-24-2000 03:00 AM

Post by Mercury » 10-29-2004 08:40 AM

I KNEW IT! He's nothing more than a puppet.

Conspiracy Theorist
Pirate
Posts: 264
Joined: 05-19-2000 02:00 AM

Post by Conspiracy Theorist » 10-29-2004 08:43 AM

Thing is, the prompting he was no doubt receiving is probably what caused him to do so poorly in the 1st debate. He constantly seemed distracted and unable to concentrate on the questions.

Faedrea
Pirate
Posts: 1827
Joined: 05-17-2003 12:05 AM

Post by Faedrea » 10-29-2004 11:53 AM

Racehorse? Ben? Cherry? Any insights?

User avatar
Alien_UK
Pirate
Posts: 3638
Joined: 04-25-2004 06:22 AM

Post by Alien_UK » 10-29-2004 12:04 PM

NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate


LBC
Worked this out in all of 2 mins cost? about £10.00:D
Evidence how does a blundering speech making President suddenly become a slick talker? Answer there’s some one helping via an ear piece.


Ask the President any question you like when he is not wired, and you get a stuttering none articulate Mule.
Last edited by Alien_UK on 10-29-2004 12:07 PM, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lunacat
Pirate
Posts: 551
Joined: 05-03-2003 02:14 AM

Post by lunacat » 10-29-2004 07:32 PM

Whether it helped him ot screwed him up more...shouldn't it matter more that he cheated? Or maybe with all the rules that they put out, using an earpiece was never actually addressed...technically maybe its a loophole that they would be able to use in case someone could prove he used one(?).
And then there was such a whine fest about Kerry's pen...:rolleyes:

User avatar
Devastated
Moderator - Hammock Expert
Posts: 4943
Joined: 12-29-2002 03:00 AM

Post by Devastated » 10-30-2004 07:02 AM

The point being: it didn't help him. It just made him even more spiritedly goofy and kinda nasty when he couldn't get the signals straight. A guy who can't chew a pretzel and drink lemonade at the same time, and who can't pronounce nuclear even with Condi screaming it in his earpiece, can hardly be expected to listen to several voices at once.

This is Deer-in-the-Headlights Boy we are talking about here.
You don't have to believe everything that you think...

Ninerism
Pirate
Posts: 5288
Joined: 10-17-2000 02:00 AM

Post by Ninerism » 10-30-2004 01:52 PM

Faedrea wrote: Racehorse? Ben? Cherry? Any insights?


Faedrea, where oh where have the True Believers gone? Are they still denying that Bin Laden is taking all the credit for 9-11 in New York, too? Kinda mystifying what it will finally take for them to simply WAKE UP.......? Or as Dotcosm suggests, perhaps it is a form of collective shock and awe akin to the Stockholm Syndrome. Denial serves the True Believers best.

Ninerism

Post Reply

Return to “Politics and Government Pre-2007”