“I require at least half a roll of TP when wiping.”
But seriously, I am SO totally sick and tired of all the non stop MSM brainwashing bullshiggity. So now it's public confessions of CC sins? Don't tell me it's not a end of the world religious cult. If you don't buy in to the hysterical hype 110% you're the absolute worst kind of thoughtless soulless selfish inhuman monster
Floating the idea of cannibalism to fight CC, that's not monstrous? Yeah right. These people are insane.
Not to mention all that crapola coming out of BOTH ENDS day and day out with no wiping. EEEEEWWW!!
Climate change can kill. Not just furnace-like summer heat with its killer bushfires, not killer floods sweeping away livestock, houses and motorists, not killer cyclones lifting roofs, toppling trees, and smashing power lines. But also felo de se, self-slaughter, shuffling off this mortal coil.
Case in point: 104-year-old David Goodall, the Australian academic who traveled to Switzerland. His minder for the trip, Dr Philip Nitschke, the Australian euthanasia activist, has revealed why Dr Goodall decided to travel half-way around the world to seek assisted suicide amongst strangers rather than die at home.
It was climate change. Fear of climate change was responsible for David Goodall’s unnecessary death. A press release from Dr Nitschke’s organization, Exit International, quotes the aged but still lucid expert ecologist.
“There are just too many of us, consuming too much, changing too many ecosystems too fast,” he reportedly said. Global warming is caused by unmanaged growth. A burgeoning population is outpacing resources. Catastrophe is looming.
"It is too late to revert back to the relatively calm and evenly balanced systems we had enjoyed up to the 1950s," Goodall said in his last moments. “All we can do now is to adapt to the resulting changes and the damages we caused."
Goodall expressed deep pessimism about negotiated agreements on climate change. Changes are "spiralling out of control", he said. If this happens, life on Planet Earth could become apocalyptic. "That would decimate the populations greatly and might make the planet a very hostile place."
“When I asked if he felt he was 'getting out, just in time!, he quickly agreed,” Nitschke recalled. So what was Goodall’s solution for climate change? "Allowing end of life choice for the elderly, not just the terminally ill." So he drank the Kool-Aid. Nitschke calls it "rational suicide", but it was anything but rational.
A unique case? No. In April a prominent American gay rights lawyer, 60-year-old David Buckel doused himself in "fossil fuel" and immolated himself in a Brooklyn park as a protest against climate change. "Our present grows more desperate, our future needs more than what we've been doing," he wrote in his suicide note.
A related kind of suicide takes place in bedrooms when couples decide not to bring children into a world of ecological horror. Even as an American group called Conceivable Futures highlights their fears, philosopher Travis Rieder wants governments to penalize people for having children.
But these fears are little short of insane. The world is having no trouble feeding itself. Since 1990 world hunger has declined 40%, child mortality has halved, and extreme poverty has fallen by three quarters. Even if climate change is real, human ingenuity will muddle through. There’s no reason to commit suicide or refuse to procreate.
Doomsday is not around the corner; doomsday is in the heads of those who have swigged the climate-change Kool-Aid. In fact, an irrational fear of apocalyptic climate change is starting to sound more and more like fears of the original Kool-Aid drinkers. "Death is a million times preferable to 10 more days of this life,” the mad socialist Jim Jones told his cult followers. “If you knew what was ahead of you – if you knew what was ahead of you, you'd be glad to be stepping over tonight.”
This sounds uncomfortably like the rhetoric of some climate-change champions. And as the tragic suicide of David Goodall shows, fear-mongering fantasies can kill.
RELATED READ: Climate Change & The Ten Warning Signs For Cults
Have you thought to yourself The Climate Change movement seems more and more like a religious cult? According to established warning signs, it definitely fits the bill and as such, the fanatical devotion and doctrinal zeal of this supposedly “scientific” crusade should alarm any rational thinking human being.
Climate Change: Did we just witness the end of Big Oil?
Is the oil barrel half empty or half full? In the past week you had your pick of answers to choose from, and they were book-ended nicely from the week’s beginning to its end.
The missile and drone attack on the largest Saudi Arabian oil-refining operation, which resulted in the largest single-day gain for crude oil ever on Monday, reminded a world that had gone a long time without a geopolitical shock how central the role of oil remains.
Edited/adapted from John Gray's article @ unherd.com:
As T.S. Eliot wrote, "humankind cannot bear very much reality," and delusional thinking on the environment is increasing. For example, the demands of Extinction Rebellion – net zero carbon emissions for the UK by 2025 – are impossibly draconian. Green movements at the present time are expressions of magical thinking – attempts to ignore and escape reality, rather than understand and adapt to it.
One of the realities Green thinking passes over is geopolitics. Consider the fashionable idea that the world – or at least the capitalist West – should stop burning fossil fuels. From an environmental point of view, this may be highly desirable. In geopolitical terms, it is a recipe for global upheaval. Abruptly ending fossil fuel consumption would mean a massive drop in living standards and large-scale political disruption.
Climate protests such as Extinction Rebellion believe capitalism is dysfunctional and headed for history’s scrap heap. That does not mean a socialist economy will be any better for the environment. The worst ecological catastrophes of the last century occurred in the USSR and Maoist China, where – under the influence of a Marxian ideology in which the natural world must be "humanized" – the natural world was damaged and degraded more than in any western country.
Greens will tell you they want an economic system different from a state socialist command economy. But how this system would work has never been made clear, and in practice their demands amount to little more than what they call ‘sustainable development’. The trouble is that Green proposals involve a drop in living standards for large numbers of people, and any such fall will be unsustainable politically.
Using the most advanced technologies, including nuclear as well as solar energy, and synthetic means of food production, by building defenses against climate shifts that will occur whatever humans do, hubristic notions of "saving the planet" could be replaced by thinking on how to 'sustainably retreat' and adjust to change. Not inherently unrealizable, such a goal is the opposite of that proposed by Greens.
Encouraged to see themselves as having the power of the God in which many no longer believe, for today’s Green movements the fact an environmental or economic goal is impossible is no reason not to attempt it. As a corollary, magical thinking is obligatory. The paradox of Extinction Rebellion is that crises can be mitigated only by turning our minds to deal with reality. But realistic thinking is almost extinct.
Green as a gourd fits them all Doka and Riddick! Great reality finds up there you two! But we non brainwashed conservatives are in the minority! Now a 16 year old Swedish girl's skipping school to represent all the w. w. kids crying out loud for cc changes PDQ!
The way she distorts her lips on her mad mouth she reminds me of a complaining Munchkin!
Also below we go to cnsnews.com again, thanks Riddick!
"Kerry's baa'ch!" Obaa'ma's CC parrot and the multi talented Iran imam'$ entertainer extraordinaire is at'ter again!
There’s a top-level oceanographer and meteorologist crying “Nonsense!”on the “global warming crisis” evident to climate modelers but not in the real world.
That iconoclast is Dr. Mototaka Nakamura, and he is as well or better qualified to take a stand as the modelers he criticizes. In June he put out a small book in Japanese on “the sorry state of climate science," titled Confessions of a climate scientist: the global warming hypothesis is an unproven hypothesis,
The temperature forecasting models trying to deal with the intractable complexities of the climate are no better than “toys” or “Mickey Mouse mockeries” of the real world, he says, further accusing scientists of “data falsification” by adjusting previous temperature data to increase apparent warming. “The global surface mean temperature-change data no longer have any scientific value and are nothing except a propaganda tool to the public,” he writes.
The climate models are useful tools for academic studies, he says. However, “the models just become useless pieces of junk or worse (worse in a sense that they can produce gravely misleading output) when they are used for climate forecasting.”
Climate forecasting is simply impossible, if only because future changes in solar energy output are unknowable. As to the impacts of human-caused CO2, they can’t be judged “with the knowledge and technology we currently possess.”
He is contemptuous of claims about models being “validated”, saying the modelers are merely “trying to construct narratives that justify the use of these models for climate predictions.” And he concludes,
Since the climate models are tuned arbitrarily …there is no reason to trust their predictions/forecasts. With values of parameters that are supposed to represent many complex processes being held constant, many nonlinear processes in the real climate system are absent or grossly distorted in the models.
It is a delusion to believe that simulation models that lack important nonlinear processes in the real climate system can predict (even) the sense or direction of the climate change correctly.
Wow! What a great Article, one of "Reason" and "Intelligence".
Unfortunately, many have become, "Climate Change Cultists" in the "Jim Jones" and much like the "Ancient Cultures of Human Sacrifice" fashion. Their gods must be appeased. Of which No Reason and No Intelligence is required.
When the "infection" spreads like wild-fire and the "Civilization" can no longer function in any meaningful way, it can be delt with quite harshly. Hence, the need for Archaeologists to dig up the old and not so old Ruins. Of ""Cultures" gone wrong.......
So, ye've unburdened yer soul? WAIT! Thar's MORE. If ye truly wants t' do 'th' right thin' here's a thought: as we move into winter leave th' heat off, avoid grub, water 'n exhalin'. Everythin''ll be fine. In no time ye'll 'ave done yer part t' save th' planet! Wit' every death, thar's that much more hope fer th' Earth.
It all comes down t' a matter o' choice; ye can go voluntarily & peacefully, believin' yer sacrifice be meaningful OR go involuntarily & painfully, knowin' full well 'tis a huge crock o' sh!t. Ye're effn dead meat either way...
'I wasn't expectin' some kind o' CC Spanish Inquisition?' HO HO!Too bad, so sad for ye, unbelievers: 'tis already here
Well isn't that special! So Greta Thunberg's parents raised her to be the Freddy Krueger of Climate Extremists?
How nice their daughter's now a denier's worst nightmare - She's not justwoke, she's the absolute wokest.
“When someone is using children and teenagers in personal interests, it only deserves to be condemned,” Putin said. “I’m sure that Greta is a kind and very sincere girl. But adults must do everything not to bring teenagers and children into some extreme situations.”
Thunberg’s mother, Malena Ernman, is an opera singer; her father, Svante Thunberg, is an actor. They wrote a parenting book, called “Scenes From the Heart,” that chronicles their daughter’s climate awakening. An English-language version, under the revised title “Our House Is on Fire,” is due to be published next year.
If it gets hotter, it’s global warming. Colder, it’s climate change. Stays the same, it’s...still climate change! Which is to say that in every situation, it’s HOGWASH!
@DineshDSousa on Twitter October 30, 2019
How can he say that? I mean, it's totally preposterous. Not to mention utterly irresponsible and ignorant. Doesn't he keep up with the reports?
Is he saying when I read that new studies show there's *FOUR TIMES* as many people living in coastal areas in danger of being flooded by rising ocean levels by 2050 as previously thought, that's HOGWASH?
How in the world can something like THAT be hogwash? It's anything BUT hogwash! OF COURSE the science is settled! Except when it isn't.