Congress anonymously edits Wikipedia
Moderator: Super Moderators
Congress anonymously edits Wikipedia
Here's the feed: https://twitter.com/congressedits
This (a small program which will tweet anonymous edits made from known congressional ip addresses ): https://github.com/edsu/anon
turned up this anonymous edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?di ... =616543585
I hope this becomes a popular thing to do.
This (a small program which will tweet anonymous edits made from known congressional ip addresses ): https://github.com/edsu/anon
turned up this anonymous edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?di ... =616543585
I hope this becomes a popular thing to do.
Last edited by SquidInk on 07-14-2014 10:44 PM, edited 1 time in total.
For if it profit, none dare call it Treason.
Well, That Explains A Lot
It's a Pleiadian conspiracy!!!
This one I don't understand: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?dif ... =616751727
For if it profit, none dare call it Treason.
A tough job, but hey! Somebody's gotta do it. Does seem like a lot of work, though.SquidInk wrote: Congress edits Alex Jones entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?dif ... =616944246
To lighten the load mebbe Congress should just create a catch-all Wikipedia listing on who ISN'T a disinformation agent.
Probably an edit by a staffer for Senator C.T. Gardener. He likes to watch TV.SquidInk wrote: This one I don't understand: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?dif ... =616751727
Lyndon LaRouche would not be on that list. Clearly.Riddick wrote: A tough job, but hey! Somebody's gotta do it. Does seem like a lot of work, though.
To lighten the load mebbe Congress should just create a catch-all Wikipedia listing on who ISN'T a disinformation agent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?dif ... =615306532
For if it profit, none dare call it Treason.
Isn't it swell how Congress is sharing its secret knowledge with the public?SquidInk wrote: Lyndon LaRouche would not be on that list. Clearly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?dif ... =615306532
I mean, who needs proof, right? Hey, it's on the Internet. It must be true!
so stupid. Stupid to think this can work, stupid to think they won't be caught, stupid to deface what should be an is a valuable resource of information.
There should be a shame campaign against people who regularly deface or put lies into wikipedia.
There should be a shame campaign against people who regularly deface or put lies into wikipedia.
The heartbreaking necessity of lying about reality and the heartbreaking impossibility of lying about it.
― Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle
― Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle
-
- Pirate
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 11-24-2002 03:00 AM
- Contact:
Controversial Wikipedia edits prompt blockage of House computers
Not once, not twice, but thrice this summer. LINK
Not once, not twice, but thrice this summer. LINK