Wikileaks

[kbot]

Thought it might be god to start a dedicated thread on this since there are just so many issues coming out about the Hillary campaign - and we all know that the MSM is given bare-bones coverage.

So, here's a nice tidbit concerning the back story on the Iran nuclear deal.

Snippet:

Leaked Clinton Campaign Email Cites Kirk Quote on Iran Deal: A leaked email from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign Chairman John Podesta referenced a 2015 BuzzFeed article in which Sen. Mark Kirk predicted nuclear war in the Middle East in the wake of the Iran nuclear deal.

Podesta’s email, which was released Friday by WikiLeaks along with a cache of documents from the Clinton campaign chair, was in response to a message from John Anzalone of Anzalone Liszt Grove Research that bore the subject line, “you call it.” In his email, Anzalone included a link to the BuzzFeed article and a quote from Kirk. “This agreement condemns the next generation to cleaning up a nuclear war in the Persian Gulf,” Kirk told BuzzFeed at the time. “This is the greatest appeasement since Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler.”

“Yup,” Podesta said in response to the email.

http://jpupdates.com/2016/10/13/nationa ... coalition/

Nice, huh?

[Riddick]

Nice, huh?

I've long thought if ever there was a Commander-In-Chief HRC, nukes would fly eventually if not sooner and this leak does nothing to disabuse me of that notion

Hopefully not everything about Hillary HAS to be inevitable.

[Doka]

I tell ya what, we are so close to provoking a war with Russia at this very moment. Obama may not wait for crazy hiltery, that would miff her. We can only hope, that Putin will keep his cool , with these evil ,stupid people! Putin is evil but Not stupid.

[kbot]

And now........ the Goldman Sachs/ Wall St speeches........

Yup, if ANYONE is gonna save us from Wall St, it's Hillary..........

Snippet:

WikiLeaks releases transcripts of Clinton Goldman Sachs speeches

White Plains, New York (CNN)WikiLeaks released Saturday what appear to be transcripts of Hillary Clinton's three paid speeches to financial heavyweight Goldman Sachs.
The remarks, which were hacked as part of an extensive breach of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's email account, show Clinton commenting on Wall Street's role in financial regulations, relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin and the damage done to US foreign policy by past WikiLeaks releases.

The Clinton campaign declined to confirm the authenticity of any of the transcripts and CNN cannot independently confirm their authenticity. But the campaign has not challenged any emails in other WikiLeaks releases and this is the second time transcripts from Clinton's paid speeches have been made public by the group.

Clinton's campaign compared the WikiLeaks hack to Watergate, the scandal that lead to the resignation of President Richard Nixon.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/15/politics/ ... -speeches/

Ironic that Hillary's own campaign would compare her to Nixon..........

[Doka]

Here it is in one article! I think the New York Post may have broken a "spell"

All About Forked Tongue Ms C and Her Slimy Friends

Leaked emails reveal Hillary Clinton’s life of deceit

http://nypost.com/2016/10/15/the-hillar ... of-deceit/

[Doka]

Another Day (Sunday 10/16/2016) another "Dump" #9

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-1 ... lth-medica
======================================
I am having some difficulty with certain web sites , may just be me?

[kbot]

None of these issues appear to matter to the Hillary supporters - they'd rather deal in unproven allegations than facts that taint their candidate, or the hypocrisy of "being for women" while receiving millions from countries that oppress women. I am continuously amazed by the pro-women voters out there that back Hillary to the hilt, yet refuse to acknowledge or discuss how Hillary and her husband recovered from being dirt poor by accepting monies from Third World dictatorships that treat women so poorly.

I guess they're all just expendable collateral damage - just as long as Hillary is elected........

[kbot]

And, who says that there's no media bias??????

Michael Issikoff says NBC is sitting on devastating tape of Juanita Broaddrick

The NBC subsidiary of Comcast is reportedly combing its archives for material damaging to Donald Trump but ignoring requests to air the full interview with Juanita Broaddrick by Lisa Myers 17 years ago.

According to Brent Schur of the Free Beacon:


The reporter that first learned about Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky said on Thursday that NBC is sitting on the full tape of its initial interview with Bill Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick and should release it before the election.

Michael Isikoff, who was a leading reporter during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, said in a Thursday discussion that NBC should release a 17-year-old tape of an interview that it conducted with Broaddrick. Broaddrick has long claimed that the interview that NBC aired edited out her claim that Hillary Clinton was involved in quashing Broaddrick’s rape claims.

“NBC has the full tape of the original Lisa Myers interview,” Isikoff said during an online discussion on Sidewire.com. “NBC ought to check its archive and run the full interview. (AS long as they’re now culling their archives!)”

The network previously ran the tape but edited out material that was damaging to Hillary. This conspiracy has some history to it.

“Folks have made much of the fact that her claim about the conversation she had with Hillary wasn’t in the interview that run,” Isikoff said. “Broaddrick said it got cut out; Lisa Myers has since agreed Broaddrick said this then—and NBC chose to cut it out.”

NBC has never released an unedited version of its interview with Broaddrick.

Both NBC and the Washington Post “closely vetted” Broaddrick’s claims at the time and chose to run with stories on her claims, Isikoff said.

If we believe that the cover-up is always worse than the crime (which has been media gospel since Watergate, regarded as the high point of American journalism by most journalists themselves), then Hillary’s suspected intimidation of a woman raped by her husband in order to keep her silent surely outweighs any of the accusations of boorishness lobbed at Donald Trump.

This time, there is tape. Tape is what made the difference in focusing public attention on Trump's alleged misbehavior.

Maybe it is time for the torches and pitchforks to start parading in front of 30 Rock.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/201 ... rick_.html

[kbot]

New info:

WikiLeaks emails show Clinton campaign collected data to discredit Bill Clinton accuser

By Rosalind S. Helderman

October 15 

After Juanita Broaddrick, who has long accused former president Bill Clinton of raping her in 1978, repeated those allegations in a January tweet, aides to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton quickly moved to gather information that could be used to undermine her account, hacked internal campaign emails released Saturday by the group WikiLeaks show

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html

[kbot]

BREAKING:

Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'

Wikileaks says an unidentified "state actor" has shut down internet access for its founder Julian Assange.

The transparency activist has been claiming asylum at London's Ecuadorean embassy since 2012 to avoid extradition over sex assault allegations.

There was no way to immediately verify if he had been knocked offline, and if so, how a state actor was suspected.

Wikileaks has recently been releasing emails from Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
Eleven revelations from Clinton emails

The anti-secrecy organisation did not return calls and emails on Monday, though it said in a tweet: "We have activated the appropriate contingency plans."

A woman who picked up the phone at the Ecuadorean embassy said: "I cannot disclose any information."

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37680411

"Gee", one asks, "who on Earth would possibly want to shut-up Assange and Wikileaks??????"

Must be the Russians I guess.........

[Riddick]

"Gee", one asks, "who on Earth would possibly want to shut-up Assange and Wikileaks??????"

Must be the Russians I guess.........

Or ETs who are concerned it's all getting too close to full disclosure of their undue influence on the American political process, in particular their ongoing involvement in the Clinton campaign

Aliens have control of Hillary's mind AND body. Like most of the Wikileaks info, they don't want 'confirmation' to come out of what everyone already knows. But more than that they don't want to be identified as being alien time travelers too...

VOTING IS IRRELEVANT.

[Doka]

'"Renegade " aliens have always been allowed to play with us humans, but "Sheesh!" Enough is Enough already.

[kbot]

And the list of "What might have been......" is starting to grow with the realization starting to gel with the Democrats with each Wikileak release . This is a great article focusing on Sanders supporters - but I'm willing bet to even Hillary supporters will be wondering what's going on. For example, there's a line in the article about some changes directed towards nurses:

Snippet:

Ms. DeMoro, of the nurses’ union, expressed outrage over an email sent to Mr. Podesta by Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, who vowed to combat the nurses’ “high and mighty sanctimonious conduct.” (Mr. Podesta replied, “Thanks.”)


In Hindsight, Backers of Bernie Sanders Lament What Might Have Been

Even to skeptics, the presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders has often appeared less quixotic with the benefit of hindsight.

If Mr. Sanders had only edged Hillary Clinton in Iowa — and not the other way around — before winning a blowout in New Hampshire, perhaps things would have been different.

If he had only attacked Mrs. Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state, instead of offering her a reprieve, some supporters lamented, perhaps things would have been different.

And now, as Mrs. Clinton contends with daily disclosures from the hacked messages of top campaign aides — missives that have reinforced the central progressive criticisms of her bid, including her coziness with Wall Street — some of Mr. Sanders’s admirers have been compelled to consider again what might have been.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/19/us/po ... .html?_r=0

[kbot]

From another article:

Snippet:

"In any other year Democrats would have the luxury of throwing elbows at each other but everyone is cognizant of the crystal clear disaster that a Trump presidency would be for progressives and America," said Strother.

The Democratic Party is definitely experiencing its own share of strife, which seems to be going largely simmering under the radar said Jeff Brauer, political science professor at Keystone College.

Brauer said while you see high profile surrogates such as First Lady Michelle, President Barack Obama, vice president Joe Biden, former vice-president Al Gore hitting the stump for Clinton's campaign giving an appearance of party unity, "Under the surface, there are profound chasms that have been developing for some time."

Most notably is the continued distrust of Clinton's conduct and policies by Bernie Sanders supporters said Brauer, "While many have reluctantly come to Clinton's side out of the fear of a Trump presidency, they have no real loyalty to Clinton," he said.

Recently leaked emails have only served to confirm their suspicions about Clinton's ethics and progressive credentials. Even if they do get themselves to vote for Clinton in the general election, they will remain as adversarial watchdogs during a Clinton presidency.

"Many certainly don't see themselves as party stalwarts and can't be depended upon by Democratic Party leaders," said Brauer.

Perhaps the most troublesome rift in the Democratic Party is the exodus of numerous white working and middle class families. They see themselves as hard working and doing the right things but not able to get ahead.

"They were especially hit hard during the great recession and haven't been able to recover," said Brauer.

While they have roots in the Democratic party, they no longer believe the party's policies are helping them, he said, "They believe the party has been usurped by metropolitan elites and their interests; they feel frustrated and abandoned and are seeking alternatives."

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/democra ... id/753966/

[Doka]

Wikileaks Dump # 11 10/18/2016

Not sure where #10 went, will look for it, when I have time. Also there seems to be a question about the welfare of Assange
===================================================
Wikileaks Releases Another 1,894 Podesta Emails In Part 11 Of Data Dump; Total Is Now 17,150

Here are some initial observations from the latest leak:


More "quid pro quo"? - the Campaign was aware of emails being released by State prior to actual event, including direct link to them: LinkDid the Clinton campaign collude with Dianne Feinstein -- even though she's concerned about classified info: Link

"... she wants to be a surrogate on Benghazi. Senate Intel did a bipartisan report while she was chair finding no wrongdoing. She also talked to IC IG yesterday who repeated no criminal referral but said he was still concerned about classified info on the thumb drive and possibly the server. Diane later talked to HRC and reiterated offer to help."David Kendall interaction that leads to phone call: LinkWhat was the "vulnerability meeting"?: 

LinkStrategist Tom Cosgrove suggests giving Goldman money to Children's defense fund as “it gives her a legitimate opportunity to get the public to appreciate her long history of social justice in a way that just talking about it or advertising it doesn't.”:

 LinkClinton campaign was inspired by Jeb Bush's stance on the economy, praising Bush’s “message” for attracting “half of african americans and democrats and two thirds of latinos.” ... “Some thought it ended too harsh. But the perspective on the economy has really worked. Now we didn't tell people this was from bush.

But its a warning,” reads the mail from Lake Research to Clinton advisor Minyon Moore: LinkNeera Tander is not a fan of Harvard professor Larry Lessig, who announced his candidacy for the Democratic nomination for president in August 2015, is harshly criticized in an email by Neera Tanden. 
“I f*cking hate that guy. Like I'd like to kick the sh*t out of him on twitter...but I know that is dumb,” Tanden writes to Podesta. Link


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-1 ... -now-17150

==============================================

Hillary Considered Tim Cook, Bill Gates, Mary Barra, Mike Bloomberg For Vice President, Hacked Email Reveals

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-1 ... ident-hack

========================

Haven't read the above myself yet, a shot in the dark opinion. They are all too smart for her, she needed to follow the "Obamz Way. Only "clowns" for VP.