Diogenes wrote: According to Carville Obama has done a fairly good job in the Middle East - can you imagine what he would say if there were a Republican in the WH?
My hearing fails when serpent face is on TV.
Moderator: Super Moderators
Diogenes wrote: According to Carville Obama has done a fairly good job in the Middle East - can you imagine what he would say if there were a Republican in the WH?
Raggedyann wrote: It's because of the past pack of Booosh lies that people are not believing a thing that's being said in this current push to war. It may be convenient for all the "righties" here to forget the worst U.S. war criminal the world has ever seen but the rest of the world has NOT forgotten!
Hey now RA, I've no problem with a nice polite discussion of Bush's role in all this - indeed if I were an advocate of 'prohibition,' most certainly I needn't have even mentioned him. Still, to keep a sense of proportion by way of degrees there's the whole matter of imbibing responsibly and knowing when to quit, not to mention too much of a good thing could lead to acute alcohol poisoning...Raggedyann wrote: I guess if you want to forget about Bush's role in all of this you could be considered a "teetotaler". I could think of some better labels but as we are being polite, I'll pass on those. Wink wink nudge nudge say no more.
Diogenes wrote: RA,
One would have to be living in the US to truly understand why we don't believe anything "they" say. The US is war weary and that is valid. For the rest of us who can think beyond GWB we have been thru Obamacare, his squandering of our money to pay off his cronies, the hypocrisy of Eric Holder. record unemployment, food stamps, disability, seventeen trillion in debt, and on and on and on.
We are sick of all of them and have moved on from GWB. He has been gone over a Presidential term ago and folks just need to grow up and try to be honest.
Raggedyann wrote: One does not have to live in the U.S. to not believe anything "they" say. Do you not think your allies are not war weary too? Trust me, we are sick of all of them too. Your post sounds like you believe me to be an Obama supporter. How many times do I have to say I'm not?
It's not Obama who's not getting the point. It's the obstinate trio of strike-challenged council chimps being blind, deaf and dumb to evil.kbot wrote: Three UN Security Council members are against the US getting involved - one of them our chief ally. You'd think Obama would get the point.........
Lol.The government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Monday said it welcomed a Russian proposal to avert U.S. military strikes by having Damascus turn over control of its chemical weapons to international monitors.
The statement by Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem in Moscow offered the first indication that a diplomatic solution may be possible to the international standoff that has evolved since apparent chemical weapons attacks on rebel-held suburbs outside Damascus on August 21…
Moualem said Syria “welcomes the Russian initiative,” but did not say whether his country would agree to what Russia was asking. “We also welcome the wisdom of the Russian leadership, which is trying to prevent American aggression against our people,” Moulaem said.
Hours earlier, in London, Secretary of State John F. Kerry sketched out a similar transfer-of-control scenario, then dismissed it, after being asked by a reporter whether there was anything that Assad could do to avoid an attack. “Sure, he could turn over every bit of his weapons to the international community within the next week, without delay,” Kerry said. “But he isn’t about to.”
Well, as it is at the FF2 the whole subject's had no more than mention from racehorse as part of his regular C2C rehashing, with NO one voicing an opinion either way on Syria - Still, I'd not go so far as to say silence implies tacit approval on anyone's part -Diogenes wrote: He is a real be true to your school kind of guy - he would say nothing or it's a great idea.
Riddick wrote: Well, as it is at the FF2 the whole subject's had no more than mention from racehorse as part of his regular C2C rehashing, with NO one voicing an opinion either way on Syria - Still, I'd not go so far as to say silence implies tacit approval on anyone's part -
OTOH, wouldn't being really true to one's school entail being on board in a big way, regardless of one's personal opinion - in saying nothing, might it not indicate an absence of loyalty and/or a crisis of conscience in Rom's case?
Ah, I hadn't considered the "wimp factor" in all this - In case of crisis, cowardice trumps conscience?Diogenes wrote: Being True to Your School implies cheerleading to me - blind acceptance and faith - always.
If one is that way it normally follows if there is something so abherrant to them they will say nothing rather than utter a differing opionion which might appear as thou they are straying from the party line. Silence on the part of folks like that merely means they are wimps.
Riddick wrote: Ah, I hadn't considered the "wimp factor" in all this - In case of crisis, cowardice trumps conscience?
Riddick wrote: Ah, I hadn't considered the "wimp factor" in all this - In case of crisis, cowardice trumps conscience?
Yeah, I can definitely see that as an option against appearing to cross lines and join the opposition -
Kind of like a silent strike against a Syria strike by members of the U.A.W. (Union of American Wimps)
Remember the TV series "The Fugitive"? Richard Kimball was wrongly convicted of the murder of his wife, and after fate reprieved him from a trip to the death house, for four long years he managed to elude the police lieutenant obsessed with his capture.Diogenes wrote: I'm not sure that cowardice could ever trump conscience.