Originally posted by Riddick After Nudists, the Necrophiliacs are next in line for normalization...somebody's gotta do it.
Aw man..... you had to go there, didn'tcha??????? That's just wrong......
Moderator: Super Moderators
Doka wrote: I have another theory on these developments. It is called "Eugenics". If you will notice the current trend is acceptance and a push for any life style that will not likely produce offspring in of itself. Traditional marriage is being re-written as to be almost frowned upon & being pushed from favor. Some Women screaming that the right to abortion at one day to 9 months is a "must right". The "morning after pill" given to any child that can say "morning after pill" please. Just some food for thought. What do you all think?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics
http://www.crichton-official.com/essay-stateoffear-
whypoliticizedscienceisdangerous.html
http://www.cato.org/publications/speech ... icy-ethics
Doka wrote: I am not really saying it is a good thing or bad thing, for myself I'm out of the "loop" sort of speak. What I am saying is, I get the feeling that TPTB are "herding" the populace in a certain direction.
Doka wrote: I have another theory on these developments. It is called "Eugenics". If you will notice the current trend is acceptance and a push for any life style that will not likely produce offspring in of itself. Traditional marriage is being re-written as to be almost frowned upon & being pushed from favor. Some Women screaming that the right to abortion at one day to 9 months is a "must right". The "morning after pill" given to any child that can say "morning after pill" please. Just some food for thought. What do you all think?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics
http://www.crichton-official.com/essay-stateoffear-
whypoliticizedscienceisdangerous.html
http://www.cato.org/publications/speech ... icy-ethics
Doka wrote: You are probably right Ra, I have been reading about The Great Population Explosion. Probably went to my head.
Maybe we should be free to make up our own minds about what we want in our private lives as far as sex partners are concerned.Cherry Kelly wrote: YES, the majority of people object to the term "marriage" being compromised from its origin of man to woman. They also believe that the unions, partnerships or male to male, female to female - should have legal rights. Such legal rights as inheritance, taxes, insurance, hospital visitation rights, etc.
The gov't should be kept out of the "marriage" bit - but with this administration - the Bill of Rights has been violated in many other ways.
What will happen next is anyone's guess. Yes next we will hear of other demands. Not just oh marriage to animals or objects, but multiple people, etc.
who knows?
Lore wrote: This idea that allowing gays to marry will have severe consequences opening the door to other things is just a constant argument that is made whenever a controversial bill is proposed or passed or an unpopular legal decision is made.